Blockly Events

Moderators: Voyager, BertB, grovkillen, Stuntteam, LisaM

Post Reply
Message
Author
TD-er
Core team member
Posts: 8749
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 22:13
Location: the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Blockly Events

#21 Post by TD-er » 05 Feb 2018, 09:38

manjh wrote: 03 Feb 2018, 21:54 [...]
Sure, keep dreaming. How do you think the compilers were built? Or even the firmware? Treasure what you have today, but donot deny what lies at the base...
True that there is still need for those kind of programming techniques and people to maintain them.
But the fact is that such knowledge is quite a specialism and often too complicated for most.
And if it is done right, abstraction will help people making less mistakes and achieve results with less work.

I've been programming in C++ a lot, but still find it a real burden sometimes to see how much effort it takes to do a simple task.
Working with ESPeasy makes me appreciate the -sometimes bloated- libraries available at my daytime job ;) and still allow me to get to the bottom of detailed bit-banging and old fashioned memory management.

manjh
Normal user
Posts: 516
Joined: 08 Feb 2016, 11:22

Re: Blockly Events

#22 Post by manjh » 05 Feb 2018, 10:24

I fully agree. The key is: use the proper technique for the job.
in most cases, using methods like Blockly is OK.

But when programming for the ISS (the Space Station, that is!) or one of the new medical operation robots, let's make sure we understand the code all the way down to the last bit...
Can you imagine an astronaut (during a spacewalk) or a surgeon (while doing open-heart surgery) reading on the screen: "unknown error. Please reboot." ... :-(

Having said that, I still maintain my original statement about having lots of fun when writing Assembler code...
Also, I think we should end this discussion as it is very much off-topic... :-)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests