ESPEasy v2.0.0-dev12 released

[grovkillen]

Please report on GitHub.

[vader]

Had the same. Just make a reset and config the ESP from scratch (no config restore to be sure!). After that:

Rule:
on Button#State do
if [Button#State]=1
event switchon
else
event switchoff
endif
endon

[Submit]

Log:
197926 : FILE : Saved config.dat
197951 : FILE : Saved security.dat

[Shardan]

I've configured a "blank" ESP-12E for my dust sensor prototype with 2.0.0-DEV12 TESTING, sources Oct.25. '17.
No issues even with a lot of rules.

[mrwee]

I'm able to reproduce this across different ESP8266 based products: Sonoff Basic, Sonoff S20, Sonoff TH16 & Wemos D1 mini pro.
My settings are:
- Various names for the device, e.g. "Garden light east"
- Different Unit ID's (e.g. 95, 128, 136)
- Static IP address
- OpenHAB MQTT with IP address
- NTP server set to IP addess
- Two devices configured: Button & Relay GPIO's

To me it seems like when the rule(s) become too long, the error occurs. I cannot reproduce at all with dev11.

Edit: Most tests have been performed with freshly flashed devices. Have also tried the 'reset' command, and starting all-over. Same result.

[mrwee]

This rule:

On System#Boot do //When the ESP boots, do
publish %sysname%/sysname,%sysname%
publish %sysname%/IP,%ip%
publish %sysname%/relay/Switch,[relay#Switch]
timerSet,1,60 //Set Timer 1 for the next event in 30 seconds
endon

On Rules#Timer=1 do //When Timer1 expires, do
publish %sysname%/relay/Switch,[relay#Switch]
timerSet,1,60 //Resets the Timer 1 for another 30 seconds
endon

results in the 'FS : Error while reading/writing config.dat in 926" error on one Sonoff TH10, but not on another TH10. Settings are identical (besides the obvious IP, device ID etc.).

If I change it to:

On System#Boot do //When the ESP boots, do
publish %sysname%/sysname,%sysname%
publish %sysname%/IP,%ip%
publish %sysname%/relay/Switch,[relay#Switch]
endon

then it works.

If I change it to:

on onoff#push=1 do
if [relay#Switch]=1
gpio,12,0
else
gpio,12,1
endif
endon

I get the error on the same module, but not the other.

If I change it to:

on onoff#push=1 do
endon

then no error.

Seems to me, that it could be related to the size of the rule.