Very Nice. If the pull is accepted, I will look to move jeedom plugin on this format as it's simplier and flexible with the JSON body no need to do extra job for URL too long

On Jeedom I save thé IP of esp when receive generic HTTP request. No need for esp to add it, it's un thé request as IP source

Yes PWM, for dimmable light
Ok so the Input can be used for switches, already very nice
If interested, contact you by MP ?

Very interesting project.
Have you planned variations of this box for other usages, like relais+input and more than all dimmer+input ?

I have no idéal for setup, but defintly interested un the solution to come for this. It's an usage I wpuld like for future house, driving dimmable led with esp

In Jeedom, we have autocreation of devices and sensors for espeasy. Just need to add the actions as required.
But there is not OTGW plugin actually

And the plugin configuration page giving you the informations to put in ESPeasy :
And of course, thanks to @Martinus and all the others that work on ESPeasy to provide such a nice and easy platform

Hi, Just want to share with you that now Jeedom has a dedicated plugin for ESPeasy. Thanks to the Generic HTTP output in ESPeasy, it was possible to made a plugin that will automaticly create the esp inside Jeedom So, in Jeedom when you activate the plugin, it will display the 3 parameters to fill i...

Ok, get my Wemos working back at home. 2 questions about Generic HTTP : 1 - is it working with HTTPS ? I can set the port, but not specify it will be https, maybe it will fail if espeasy is not expecting https 2 - the Publish Template field has a limit and it's short, that doesn't permit to put a cl...

Hi, Very happy to see this, I will implement a Jeedom plugin to make it easier again and generic also on Jeedom side. @Martinus or anyone can you confirm me this : %sysname% = ESP Name -> global for one ESP ? %tskname% = Task name -> name of the task on ESP %id% = Task id -> ID of the task on ESP %v...

Yes will be very good to have such a connector.
If someone care enough to integrate this plugin, I will be happy to build a dedicated plugin for ESPeasy in Jeedom and give it more light

Hi, I'm having the same issue. Finally want to jump to ESPeasy after insuring it's working for users with my MQTT plugin for Jeedom. So I have received some Sonoff, read the post and ready to upload. Well ... I'm only using Linux, laptop, server, you don't need a Windows. But the firmware : Windows ...

I haven't see the 3 orders to send.
Have implement them, waiting for feedback
Thanks for your work

Hi, I get some feedback from RTS not working in sending with the R37 The orders are seen by Rflink. If order is sent, the rflink just answer with its OK trame and that's all, no reaction from the blinds. As it is say in the release notes to be working, is it really working or will have more to come ...

Yes I have read also the thread on Domoticz about this product. But from the 3 sources (Domoticz, the link I give and the article from hackaday he refers) I understand that to have the H801 seen on your network you must have the Android app connected to the RGB module AP with router option activated...

Hi, Some must have read about this product avalaible from Aliexpress and can find hack here for exemple : https://eryk.io/2015/10/esp8266-based-wifi-rgb-controller-h801/ It's an ESP based product for controlling 5 LED channels. The original sketch is really bad, you must connect to the thing AP and ...

Hi....i' am brazilian people and have used the Jeedom software and recently found the EspEasy.This combination is amazing!! I have used the MQTT protocol sucessfull where on the EspEasy config have used the "OpenHab MQTT".On the Jeedom i use the MQTT plugin by Lunarok.I have one problem o...

My answer "totally agree" was to question of Martinus "so Jeedom users don't need HTTP support if ESP easy is supporting mySensors protocol" Still my answer, Jeedom will be able to work with the mySensors plugin. But I agree too that a general HTTP interface and same for the MQTT...

Yes, completly true

Un mysensors 1.6, multiple gateways become a common case as it's the strategy taken to integrate esp sensors.
So if espeasy can'speak' mysensors, thats Nice.
Me I know in jeedom i have to do a big rewrite to intégrante multiple gateways but i will do it for mysensors 1.6 whatever

Another Jeedom user, ESPeasy attracting people.

Don't forget the generic HTTP please, will be easier and get a dedicated plugin inside Jeedom for this

Just an idea to get the best of the 2 worlds. Is it possible in ESPeasy to have the mySensors communication like MQTT and HTTP ? This will be a dream, get the nice interface of ESPeasy, easy configuration (and reconfiguration) plugged inside the mySensors world. With this you can get a better integr...

Yeah, and not to say that the ability to put the same firmware on all your nodes, and "just" configure is so gooooddd That's really the best thing I have see in ESPeasy. Take 20 of them, upload your sketchs and after just connect on a web page. That's nice mySensors to compare, the functio...

You are totally right about there is no real standart. a few weeks ago, i wasn´t even thinking about MQTT, i have it installed now, funny to Play with, and it works. But for simple things / beginners, it´s to complicated, starting already with the needed Broker.... I don´t know about domotics, i´m ...

Hi henk, nice to see you here too (if you're here, it means ESPeasy is already famous like mysensors) So it means mySensors network will be including a lot of gateway for each ESP there is one ? Speaking of Jeedom, the plugin is not ready for multi-gateway (I want to add the possibility for a second...

Again this has already been asked, but if the http protocol was generic and configurable in ESPeasy, it will be usefull for other home automation software. If Domoticz cannot use a dummy device like any other device it's not the case for alls. FHEM, Jeedom and a lot more will be happy to have it ope...

+1 this, input linked to output, no need to get the controller acting, if controller is unavalaible still working

Yeah, but if you already use MQTT, it's done you have it in your home automation software (at least for the ones with the right plugins)

General HTTP is simplier, no MQTT broker, no mqttwarn, direct to home automation platform

I will +1 this request here As I say on my presentation, general HTTP will permit for exemple to have Jeedom working for receiving push and sending request to ESPeasy. That's all what is needed a general option with the URL for push to give (like many alarm, IPX and other hardware have) For MQTT the...

Hi,

Under jeedom you van use mqtt and set your ESP with the openhab mqtt connector

Yes I completly agree, not for user, user don't need this info and will be scared :) It can be inside github, will be nice (I have check in the github as I don't find in wiki) As github is more dev oriented will be nice. Using their wiki feature or just a simple text file in the source for reference...

So starting by Jeedom. It's a growing home automation software at least in France, it's an open source project, build in PHP mainly. But plugins can use any languages. The project is backed by a company providing 3 boxes : Mini+, Pro and Center (to be released) and the plugins are avalaible through ...

Selamat pagi dari Perancis

Hi, Get your project from a member of Jeedom forum and very interested. So here, french user of Jeedom but also maintener of the MQTT plugin for Jeedom. So I will check it's working out of the box with Jeedom. Is it possible after that to add Jeedom in the list of software ? I can also give you the ...