clearly something else is wrong.. check the minicom serial port settings..
and uh..
VERSION;
V 3.3.2.1-rc9 SIGNALduino cc1101 - compiled at Jun 16 2019 20:18:01
Does not look like RFLink..
Search found 773 matches
- 28 Jul 2021, 23:57
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Baseline by Heidemann 70705R
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13654
- 24 Jul 2021, 18:45
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Baseline by Heidemann 70705R
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13654
Re: Baseline by Heidemann 70705R
Yes, see: http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
for more info
for more info
- 19 Jul 2021, 12:16
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RTS Records getting overwritten
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12526
Re: RTS Records getting overwritten
It looks like the 00 is the problem...
- 02 Jul 2021, 15:49
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFLink and boot from USB
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18468
Re: RFLink and boot from USB
Perhaps a ground loop issue?
- 12 Jun 2021, 00:23
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RTS Records getting overwritten
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12526
Re: RTS Records getting overwritten
I will take a look at that..
- 16 May 2021, 23:50
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFLink receives no signal from Brel Remote
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13381
Re: RFLink receives no signal from Brel Remote
That remote appears to support bi-directional as well as uni-direction communication modes.
Try switching to uni-directional mode.
Try switching to uni-directional mode.
- 10 May 2021, 21:13
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Any one successfully using "Aldi" BBQ Sensor (ET923)?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 15336
Re: Any one successfully using "Aldi" BBQ Sensor (ET923)?
I will try to locate your mail...
- 10 May 2021, 17:27
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Any one successfully using "Aldi" BBQ Sensor (ET923)?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 15336
Re: Any one successfully using "Aldi" BBQ Sensor (ET923)?
It is not yet supported.
check http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
check http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
- 30 Apr 2021, 12:29
- Forum: RFLink: French support forum
- Topic: BFT command from one RFLink not recognized by another RFlink
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4730
Re: BFT command from one RFLink not recognized by another RFlink
When RFLink sends the BFT command, does the gate respond?
- 17 Apr 2021, 20:31
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Unknown device uncommon to integrate (Piazzetta P956)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 25840
Re: Unknown device uncommon to integrate (Piazzetta P956)
Hi,
Check: http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
That explains what I need.
With the raw packets it should be possible to see if it is something easy to implement or not.
We are currently working on a new site to streamline devlopment.
Check: http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
That explains what I need.
With the raw packets it should be possible to see if it is something easy to implement or not.
We are currently working on a new site to streamline devlopment.
- 30 Mar 2021, 00:20
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFlink Rxx beta
- Replies: 10
- Views: 19839
Re: RFlink Rxx beta
The main delay is waiting for people to report back if implemented changes are working or not..
In some cases I do not hear back at all which means I have to roll back.
In some cases I do not hear back at all which means I have to roll back.
- 28 Mar 2021, 00:39
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Rflink with 433, 868 and NRF24L01
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13653
Re: Rflink with 433, 868 and NRF24L01
You can combine:
433+NRF and/or 868+NRF
433+NRF and/or 868+NRF
- 25 Mar 2021, 18:05
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: [solved] Thermo Hygrosender TFA 30.3245.02
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16258
Re: Thermo Hygrosender TFA 30.3245.02
0x72 = 114 decimal = 11.4 degrees Note that the humidity value itself could be off as the device might be using different bits to transfer that value. Anyway, this is not about the values being right or wrong, but about identfying the right packet in the first place. Does your sender have a led that...
- 25 Mar 2021, 12:59
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: [solved] Thermo Hygrosender TFA 30.3245.02
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16258
Re: Thermo Hygrosender TFA 30.3245.02
Could it be it is detected as the Xiron?
- 25 Mar 2021, 12:53
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFlink Rxx beta
- Replies: 10
- Views: 19839
Re: RFlink Rxx beta
Beta/test versions are only supplied to people who have reported an issue and that need to test the fixes applied to the code.
- 21 Mar 2021, 22:19
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24037
Re: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
Ok, great info..
I am looking at the tilt commands as well.
I am looking at the tilt commands as well.
- 17 Mar 2021, 20:24
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24037
Re: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
A solution is in the works.
Anyone technical with a usb logic analyzer that has this issue?
In any case, we could use someone with the issue being able to debug and test..
Anyone technical with a usb logic analyzer that has this issue?
In any case, we could use someone with the issue being able to debug and test..
- 15 Mar 2021, 13:18
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: The project is NOT dead...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13720
Re: The project is NOT dead...
The last beta is from 2 days ago. The fact that it is not public does not mean things are not moving.
Many many people are getting support both with protocol implementations and help with how to use it in various platforms.
I have sent you a PM regarding your non-working devices.
Many many people are getting support both with protocol implementations and help with how to use it in various platforms.
I have sent you a PM regarding your non-working devices.
- 14 Mar 2021, 20:22
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Is RF Link even supported and maintained anymore?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 16772
Re: Is RF Link even supported and maintained anymore?
Correct, at least someone got it.
Case closed!
Case closed!
- 10 Mar 2021, 23:55
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: (Solved) RF-Link documentationlink is dead
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16125
Re: (Solved) RF-Link documentationlink is dead
Obviously RFLink is supported via rflink.nl and is not at all dead. @siggy, it is fine if you want to believe that and want to use something else. But dont bother posting here with incorrect statements. A new release is planned. One of the issues we are facing is that we get hundreds of support requ...
- 15 Feb 2021, 12:56
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: RFLink wordt niet meer herkend
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10695
Re: RFLink wordt niet meer herkend
Sluit je RFlink op een PC aan, maak verbinding met RFlink loader.. kijk of je data te zien krijgt van apparaten. Is dit het geval, dan is een eeprom reset niet nodig. Moet je wel een reset uitvoeren, check dit dan op de pc met rflinkloader. Heb je alleen problemen met een pi en de herkenning van de ...
- 10 Feb 2021, 11:42
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Is RF Link even supported and maintained anymore?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 16772
Re: Is RF Link even supported and maintained anymore?
Not dead at all, but email is still flooded by support requests.
We are working on it and provide test versions where needed.
I am not sure when there will be a new release but it will come for sure.
We are working on it and provide test versions where needed.
I am not sure when there will be a new release but it will come for sure.
- 31 Jan 2021, 21:38
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Digimax RTS10
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17064
Re: Digimax RTS10
We are working on it..
As soon as it is ready we will contact you for some tests.
As soon as it is ready we will contact you for some tests.
- 05 Jan 2021, 17:31
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Custom protocol / keeloq
- Replies: 7
- Views: 19252
Re: Custom protocol / keeloq
It is currently not possible, I would have to make some changes to do that.
RFFind is not suited for longer packets like Keeloq.
RFFind is not suited for longer packets like Keeloq.
- 04 Jan 2021, 12:32
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Custom protocol / keeloq
- Replies: 7
- Views: 19252
Re: Custom protocol / keeloq
Currently that is not possible.
What kind of device do you have?
What kind of device do you have?
- 22 Dec 2020, 01:05
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RTSINVERT per individual RTS Record (per controlled blind)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 16486
Re: RTSINVERT per individual RTS Record (per controlled blind)
I think we can solve that with a small fix...
- 18 Dec 2020, 09:50
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24037
Re: Somfy Tilt & Lift 25 WireFree RTS
Yes, we are looking into it..
- 21 Nov 2020, 00:21
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Slechte ontvangst WT440H
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22682
Re: Slechte ontvangst WT440H
ik bedoelde de antenne van de WT440H
De cresta en lacrosse heb ik goede ervaringen mee.
De cresta en lacrosse heb ik goede ervaringen mee.
- 20 Nov 2020, 00:16
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Slechte ontvangst WT440H
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22682
Re: Slechte ontvangst WT440H
Ja, de WT440H is niet zo heel best kwa zend sterkte.. je zou eventueel kunnen kijken of je de antenne met een draadje kan doen
- 18 Nov 2020, 14:33
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Support Request for SilverCrest 3711A / 113854 power switch
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19529
Re: Support Request for SilverCrest 3711A / 113854 power switch
I see you already mailed in your log.
Some of your buttons are recognized, it will take a while to analyze.
Some of your buttons are recognized, it will take a while to analyze.
- 18 Nov 2020, 13:19
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Support Request for SilverCrest 3711A / 113854 power switch
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19529
Re: Support Request for SilverCrest 3711A / 113854 power switch
Supported since release 45..
- 29 Sep 2020, 14:20
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFLINK SOMFY SGS
- Replies: 16
- Views: 28611
Re: RFLINK SOMFY SGS
You can try to set RTSLONGTX Then send the ON command with RTSLONGTX activated.. this will act like a long button press If that works, then disabole RTSLONGTX after the pairing sequence so that normal commands can be send again. If not, I would need some additional info, use mail to contact me! More...
- 24 Sep 2020, 16:36
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Falmec Support
- Replies: 5
- Views: 22748
Re: Falmec Support
http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
Make a debug log and mail it..
Make a debug log and mail it..
- 23 Sep 2020, 08:48
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: How to troubleshoot RFlink 433?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23953
Re: How to troubleshoot RFlink 433?
No, there is no startup delay.
- 22 Sep 2020, 19:22
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: How to troubleshoot RFlink 433?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23953
Re: How to troubleshoot RFlink 433?
Then either you have an issue with the hardware or the sending device is not sending anything that RFlink can recognize.
What is your sending device?
What is your sending device?
- 22 Sep 2020, 17:11
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: How to troubleshoot RFlink 433?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23953
- 18 Sep 2020, 19:46
- Forum: RFLink: Hardware Related discussions
- Topic: help me - Pairing RTS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 21837
Re: help me - Pairing RTS
Hi,
You do not have RTS.
You have a device that uses the Keeloq protocol which has a rolling code.
Keyloq is receive only!
That means you can not transmit.
You do not have RTS.
You have a device that uses the Keeloq protocol which has a rolling code.
Keyloq is receive only!
That means you can not transmit.
- 13 Sep 2020, 00:55
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFLink - RTS remote control removed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21468
Re: RFLink - RTS remote control removed
RFLink should not use the same ID as your original remote.
Also make sure not too add too many remote ID's to your blinds
Also make sure not too add too many remote ID's to your blinds
- 22 Aug 2020, 23:39
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Home Assistant, Dooya V4 and an underscore
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23249
Re: Home Assistant, Dooya V4 and an underscore
RFFind is not related to Dooya.
I think you should check with HA for assistance.
The underscore is in a RFlink name label. HA should accept whatever that label is.
I think you should check with HA for assistance.
The underscore is in a RFlink name label. HA should accept whatever that label is.
- 19 Aug 2020, 10:53
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RFLink 433 & 868 Mhz
- Replies: 1
- Views: 21022
Re: RFLink 433 & 868 Mhz
You can have:
1 arduino/rflink with 433mhz (with or without 2.4 ghz)
1 arduino/rflink with 868mhz (with or without 2.4 ghz)
and connect both to one pi that runs Domoticz
1 arduino/rflink with 433mhz (with or without 2.4 ghz)
1 arduino/rflink with 868mhz (with or without 2.4 ghz)
and connect both to one pi that runs Domoticz
- 02 Aug 2020, 01:33
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: RF link firmware not recognized on jeedom
- Replies: 2
- Views: 21981
Re: RF link firmware not recognized on jeedom
Did you ask on the Jeedom forum?
https://community.jeedom.com/c/plugins/
The developer of the Jeedom plugin for RFlink is active there.
https://community.jeedom.com/c/plugins/
The developer of the Jeedom plugin for RFlink is active there.
- 07 Jul 2020, 23:58
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27743
Re: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
>Dus wellicht heeft de module die mee-schakelt ook die andere code mee-geleerd? Als dat zo zou zijn, dan moet het probleem ook met de afstandsbediening optreden. Het pakket formaat voor zenden is: 10;NewKaku;123456;1;ON; 123456; is het adres (ID) van de AB, 1; is het knop nummer. Naast ON en OFF heb...
- 07 Jul 2020, 19:31
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27743
Re: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
Onzin. Een kaku stopcontact kan je met meerdere remotes pairen.
Je kan dus zonder probleem de remote gebruiken en compleet andere ID's voor je home automation oplossing gebruiken.
Je kan dus zonder probleem de remote gebruiken en compleet andere ID's voor je home automation oplossing gebruiken.
- 07 Jul 2020, 17:50
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27743
Re: Vreemd gedrag met zenden
Andere ID's gebruiken?
- 24 Jun 2020, 00:05
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Warema 8k hand transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14912
Re: Warema 8k hand transmitter
For new/unknown devices follow the instructions here: http://www.rflink.nl/blog2/development
- 23 Jun 2020, 00:05
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Next release?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25232
Re: Next release?
and way down in line 1005: .name = "Fine Offset Electronics/ECOWITT WH51 Soil Moisture Sensor", .modulation = FSK_PULSE_PCM, You will never be able to receive these signals with the OOK based receivers due to the very simple fact that the transmitter is using FSK modulation..
- 28 May 2020, 00:11
- Forum: RFLink: Nederlands support forum
- Topic: Wireless Pool Thermometer PALMA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 28943
Re: Wireless Pool Thermometer PALMA
Wellicht binnenkort.. ben er mee bezig.
- 12 May 2020, 20:08
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: Philips Living Color Gen 1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25131
Re: Philips Living Color Gen 1
Important note: only the first gen.
there are some color issues depending on the home automation software you use.
getting the cc2500 to work can be difficult (probably related to cheap clones and proper voltage regulators)
there are some color issues depending on the home automation software you use.
getting the cc2500 to work can be difficult (probably related to cheap clones and proper voltage regulators)
- 24 Apr 2020, 14:27
- Forum: RFlink: General Discussions
- Topic: setBLE
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8701
Re: setBLE
Experimental Bluetooth
- 20 Apr 2020, 14:55
- Forum: RFLink: Unsupported devices
- Topic: Ventilation System and garage door.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 17142
Re: Ventilation System and garage door.
RFlink needs to be adapted for it.
Contact me via mail.
Contact me via mail.