Ah, that explains it.
For speed of testing, could you send the exe to me via mail? You have my mail address...
Moderators: grovkillen, Stuntteam, TD-er
Ah, that explains it.
You can download the exe from the code section. The APP_DATA.zip is unchanged so just replace the exe.manjh wrote: ↑15 Jan 2018, 23:27Ah, that explains it.
For speed of testing, could you send the exe to me via mail? You have my mail address...
Never mind, got it.....manjh wrote: ↑15 Jan 2018, 23:27Ah, that explains it.
For speed of testing, could you send the exe to me via mail? You have my mail address...
I tried on a few different ESP's. In fact, am running one now: it complains about unit name/number, and then proceeds with the other screens with no problems.grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 05:59 You need to save the settings. Batch mode will use these default settings.
Regarding the output files and unit name. These should be straight on screen shots and the name and number should be found. If not that tells me you didn't have the correct IP number? Can you confirm that the IP is that of a ESP Easy unit?
Tested and confirmed.... works great!grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 05:59 You need to save the settings. Batch mode will use these default settings.
Whoooops! That's probably it. I guess some pages are not protected by the password (JSON, SDCARD, CONFIG etc).
I would expect that all pages are protected by the login credentials. If any of them are not, that is a security gap...grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:35Whoooops! That's probably it. I guess some pages are not protected by the password (JSON, SDCARD, CONFIG etc).
Thanks for that input, and we need to go to the bottom on that one since downloading the config will let you clone a unit and get onto the network fairly easy. Lets try all the pages and file the findings to GitHub.
1. I might add the possibility to rename the actual file but the name standsmanjh wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:41 Not really test findings, but more usability suggestions:
1. change the name of the tool (especially the exe file!) to "ESPDumper". It covers the nature of the tool and is easier.
2. when the tool is called in batch mode (so when the parameter is provided), run in "quiet mode". So donot create the popup window.
Reason for this second suggestion: I am now testing with a bat file, pulling info from five units (to start with). I can run this in backhround and do other things in Windows. But each time a new unit is started, I get that popup window taking over the focus... annoying!
I will see what I can do.grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:39 Yes I will add that. Thanks for the information.
Would you be able to test all the web pages manually?
Name is only relevant for the exe file.grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:481. I might add the possibility to rename the actual file but the name standsmanjh wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:41 Not really test findings, but more usability suggestions:
1. change the name of the tool (especially the exe file!) to "ESPDumper". It covers the nature of the tool and is easier.
2. when the tool is called in batch mode (so when the parameter is provided), run in "quiet mode". So donot create the popup window.
Reason for this second suggestion: I am now testing with a bat file, pulling info from five units (to start with). I can run this in backhround and do other things in Windows. But each time a new unit is started, I get that popup window taking over the focus... annoying!
2. I will add a /HEADLESS_MODE=1 switch for the command line. I totally understand you there
Good idea.manjh wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 16:09Name is only relevant for the exe file.grovkillen wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:481. I might add the possibility to rename the actual file but the name standsmanjh wrote: ↑16 Jan 2018, 15:41 Not really test findings, but more usability suggestions:
1. change the name of the tool (especially the exe file!) to "ESPDumper". It covers the nature of the tool and is easier.
2. when the tool is called in batch mode (so when the parameter is provided), run in "quiet mode". So donot create the popup window.
Reason for this second suggestion: I am now testing with a bat file, pulling info from five units (to start with). I can run this in backhround and do other things in Windows. But each time a new unit is started, I get that popup window taking over the focus... annoying!
2. I will add a /HEADLESS_MODE=1 switch for the command line. I totally understand you there
As for the flag, I would suggest something that reflects the purpose, such as /QUIET_MODE,
But why not take quiet mode as default when running with IP as parameter?
Do you mind testing current version 0.00.012 (found here): https://github.com/Grovkillen/ESP_Easy_ ... dumper.exe
I'm gonna look into it. I make uncompressed pictures, will fix it so they are compressed by default.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests