DummyDevice - absolute vs relative addressing (enhancement proposal)

Moderators: grovkillen, Stuntteam, TD-er

Post Reply
Message
Author
jgrad
Normal user
Posts: 97
Joined: 29 Aug 2016, 22:03
Location: Slovenia

DummyDevice - absolute vs relative addressing (enhancement proposal)

#1 Post by jgrad » 30 Jan 2021, 10:27

Hi,

I am heavily using rules in my ESPeasy implementations.
What bothers me is that when I am setting value of dummy device I have to use absolute addressing of variable (TaskvalueSet, <task_num>, variable_num>, <variable_value>) and in order to keep readability of code I add comment beside what "TASK_NAME#VARIABLE_NAME" I am setting.

That why I am asking if it is possible that for setting dummy device relative addressing (addressing by name) is implemented as it is when I am reading dummy device value eg. if [TASK_NAME#VARIABLE_NAME]>0 ...

It would be fine to have command like TaskvalueSet, [TASK_NAME#VARIABLE_NAME], <variable_value>.

Thanks for answer in advance.


_Cyber_
Normal user
Posts: 115
Joined: 20 Oct 2019, 09:46

Re: DummyDevice - absolute vs relative addressing (enhancement proposal)

#3 Post by _Cyber_ » 30 Jan 2021, 16:59

+1 :-)

jgrad
Normal user
Posts: 97
Joined: 29 Aug 2016, 22:03
Location: Slovenia

Re: DummyDevice - absolute vs relative addressing (enhancement proposal)

#4 Post by jgrad » 31 Jan 2021, 10:41

Yes, this is functionality I am asking for. Hope to be implemented soon.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 46 guests